Responsible artificial intelligence and Justice 5.0 in CNJ Resolution No. 615/2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63451/dti.v2i23.339Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Judiciary, Governance, Justice 5.0, CNJ Resolution No. 615/2025Abstract
The promise that artificial intelligence (AI) will render justice faster, more efficient, and more personalized coexists with the risk that algorithms may intensify bias, opacity, and inequality. In the Brazilian Judiciary, the incorporation of predictive and generative systems typical of the Justice 5.0 paradigm makes it urgent to define safeguards capable of preventing adverse impacts on fundamental rights, democratic legitimacy, and institutional sustainability. In this context — marked by the absence of a general national AI law and by the legislative deliberation on Bill No. 2,338/2023 — this article examines the extent to which CNJ Resolution No. 615/2025 constitutes a sectoral regulatory framework for responsible AI in the Judiciary. The study adopts a qualitative, deductive approach, combining a normative–documentary analysis of the Resolution with an integrative review of recent literature (2018–2025) on algorithmic risks, risk-based governance, and justice, articulated through interpretive triangulation. The results indicate that the norm consolidates a systemic and risk-proportionate regulatory architecture, including explicit prohibitions, requirements for meaningful human oversight, mechanisms for transparency, traceability, and auditability, personal data protection measures, and institutional arrangements for plural oversight. The article concludes that the Resolution contributes to aligning the Brazilian Judiciary with the international paradigm of trustworthy AI and provides operational parameters for future national AI regulation and for the design of high-impact public policies in the justice ecosystem.
Downloads
References
BAROCAS, Solon; SELBST, Andrew D. Big Data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, Berkeley, v. 104, n. 3, p. 671-732, 2016. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2477899.
BORGESANO, Francesco; DE MAIO, Annarita; LAGHI, Pasquale; MUSMANNO, Roberto. Artificial intelligence and justice: a systematic literature review and future research perspectives on Justice 5.0. European Journal of Innovation Management, Bradford, v. 28, n. 11, p. 349-385, 2025. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-01-2025-0117.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Diário Oficial da União: seção 1, Brasília, DF, 15 ago. 2018.
CÂMARA DOS DEPUTADOS. Projeto que regulamenta uso da inteligência artificial no Brasil (PL 2338/2023). Brasília, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.camara.leg.br/noticias/1159193-projeto-que-regulamenta-uso-da-inteligencia-artificial-no-brasil?utm. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA (CNJ). Resolução nº 615, de 11 de março de 2025. Dispõe sobre a governança e o uso de Inteligência Artificial no Poder Judiciário. Brasília: CNJ, 2025. Disponível em: https://atos.cnj.jus.br/atos/detalhar/6001. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA (CNJ). Programa Justiça 4.0: conheça a iniciativa que vem mudando o Poder Judiciário brasileiro pela transformação digital e ampliação do acesso à justiça cidadã. Brasília: CNJ, 2024. Disponível em: https://bibliotecadigital.cnj.jus.br/jspui/handle/123456789/869. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
FONSECA, Bruno. Towards Responsible AI Governance in the Brazilian Judiciary. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, v. 8, n. 3, p. 2867-2868, 2025. DOI: 10.1609/aies.v8i3.36774.
GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
KRIŠTOFÍK, Andrej. Bias in AI (Supported) Decision Making: Old Problems, New Technologies. International Journal for Court Administration, The Hague, v. 16, n. 1, p. 3, 2025. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.598.
MELO, Maria Ghabryela Sá Leite. Governança algorítmica e direitos fundamentais: a construção de salvaguardas para a dignidade no uso de inteligência artificial no Judiciário. ENPEJUD – Experiências em Mostra, Maceió, 2025. Disponível em: https://enpejud.tjal.jus.br/index.php/exmpteste01/article/view/705/430. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.
MELO JÚNIOR, José Eustaquio; RODRIGUES, Waldecy. Artificial intelligence and access to justice: a systematic review of the international literature. In: Science and Connections: The Interdependence of Disciplines. [S.l.]: Seven Editora, 2024. DOI: 10.56238/sevened2024.037-194.
NOHARA, Irene Patrícia; BATAGLIA, Beatriz Unger Raphael. Governança da regulação algorítmica no Brasil: caminhos, princípios e desafios para a Administração Pública. International Journal of Digital Law, Belo Horizonte, v. 6, p. e608, 2025. DOI: 10.47975/ijdl.v6.1301. Disponível em: https://journal.nuped.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1301. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
OECD. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD AI Principles). Paris: OECD, 2019. Disponível em: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449 Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
OECD. ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. AI in justice administration and access to justice: Governing with artificial intelligence. Paris: OECD, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/06/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_398fa287/full-report/ai-in-justice-administration-and-access-to-justice_f0cbe651.html. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
SÁ-SILVA, Jackson Ronie; ALMEIDA, Cristóvão Domingos de; GUINDANI, Joel Felipe. Pesquisa documental: pistas teóricas e metodológicas. Revista Brasileira de História & Ciências Sociais, Rio Grande, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2009.
RODRIGUES, Carla; MENDONÇA, Eduardo; NÓVOA, Natasha. IA e as mudanças no Judiciário brasileiro: direitos fundamentais, transparência e governança. São Paulo: Data Privacy Brasil, 2025. Disponível em: https://www.dataprivacybr.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IA-e-as-mudancas-no-judiciario-brasileiro-Data-Privacy-Brasil.pdf. Acesso em: 15 nov. 2025.
RUSSELL, Stuart; NORVIG, Peter. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 3. ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2010.
TAMER, M. A. Regulação da inteligência artificial no Judiciário Brasileiro: análise do objeto e definições da Resolução CNJ nº 615/2025. Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região, [S. l.], v. 36, n. 162, p. 17–36, 2025. Disponível em: https://revista.trf3.jus.br/index.php/rtrf3/article/view/742. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
UNIÃO EUROPEIA. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 13 June 2024, laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, 12 jul. 2024. Disponível em: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2025.
UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO, 2021.
ZAVRŠNIK, Aleš. Algorithmic justice: Algorithms and big data in criminal justice settings. European Journal of Criminology, v. 18, n. 5, p. 623–642, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1477370819876762.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ana Cláudia Borges Coutrim dos Reis, Francisco Itami Campos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
