Fully automated decision making in procedures adopted by tax administrations

a comparative study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63451/dti.v1i20.197

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, tax administrations, uses, comparative law

Abstract

Artificial intelligence can be defined as intelligent machines that solve problems that, until then, only humans would solve. It has been used in the most diverse areas of knowledge to solve problems and make the performance of its professionals more efficient, saving time in research and data organization. It would not be different in Law. Tax administrations around the world are using artificial intelligence to solve problems that previously depended on human interference. Therefore, the question in this paper is: How are the tax administration around the world using artificial intelligence tools to improve their processes? After the presentation of its uses by Germany, China, Australia, Russia, and Brazil, it is concluded that, through it, the filling in self-assessments, the calculation of taxes and the crossing of data for checking the information provided by the taxpayer. However, the use of artificial intelligence is still absolutely inequal, which increases the efficiency gap between the tax administrations of countries that use it and those that do not have this type of technology to encourage tax collection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jacqueline Mayer da Costa Ude Braz, Universidade de São Paulo

Pós-doutora, doutora e mestre em Direito Tributário pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Especialista em Direito Tributário pela Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) e pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos Tributários (IBET). Professora de cursos de especialização em Direito Tributário. Pesquisadora do Instituto de Aplicação do Tributo (IAT). Advogada. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/8132219035834564.

References

BRASIL. Lei nº. 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Brasília, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13709.htm. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2023.

BRAUN BINDER, Nadja. Artificial Intelligence and Taxation: Risk Management in Fully Automated Taxation Procedures (October 1, 2018). Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3KtGIxO Acesso em 28/02/2023. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2023.

CHOLLET, François. Deep Learning with Python. New York: Manning, 2018.

DE LA FERIA, Rita; GRAU RUIZ, Amparo. The robotisation of tax administration. In: A. Grau (ed), Interactive robotics: legal, ethical, social, and economic aspects. Spring Nature, 2022, Ch 20, forthcoming. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3KyGvsT Acesso em: 05 mar. 2023.

DONEDA, Danilo Cesar Maganhoto; MENDES, Laura Schertel; SOUZA, Carlos Affonso Pereira de; ANDRADE, Norberto Nuno Gomes de. Considerações iniciais sobre inteligência artificial, ética e autonomia pessoal. In: Pensar: Revista de Ciências Jurídicas. Fortaleza, v. 23, n. 4, p. 1-17, out/dez 2018. Disponível em: https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/8257/pdf. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2025.

GOODFELLOW, Ian; BENGIO, Yoshua; COURVILLE, Aaron. Deep learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.

GRUS, Joel. Data science do zero: primeiras regras com o Python. Rio de Janeiro: Alta Books, 2016.

HUANG, Z. (2018) Discussion on the development of artificial intelligence in taxation. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8, 1817-1824. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/34v4xWE Acesso em: 01 mar. 2022.

MACCARTHY, J.; MINSKY, M. L.; ROCHESTER, N; SHANNON, C.E. A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. 1955. Disponível em: https://stanford.io/3tLDizN Acesso em: 28 fev. 2022.

OECD. Technologies for better tax administration: a practical guide for revenue bodies, OCDE Publishing, Paris. 2016. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3xARop0. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2022.

PEPE, Flávia Cavalcanti. Do taxman ao T-Rex: o uso da inteligência artificial no Direito Tributário Brasileiro. In: CANEN, Doris. Desafios na tributação das novas tecnologias: debates atuais. Belo Horizonte: Dialética, p. 113-117, 2021.

PERRY, Melissa; SMITH, Alexander. iDecide: the legal implications of automated decision-making. University of Cambridge, 2014. https://bit.ly/3Mt2jrX. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2022.

SCARCELLA, L.. Tax compliance and privacy rights in profiling and automated decision making. 2019. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://bit.ly/3HNFuM0. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2022.

WALKER, Joshua. On legal AI: um rápido tratado sobre a inteligência artificial no Direito. São Paulo: Thomson Reuters, 2021.

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

BRAZ, Jacqueline Mayer da Costa Ude. Fully automated decision making in procedures adopted by tax administrations: a comparative study. Direito & TI, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 20, p. 1–18, 2025. DOI: 10.63451/dti.v1i20.197. Disponível em: https://direitoeti.com.br/direitoeti/article/view/197. Acesso em: 1 jul. 2025.

Issue

Section

Artigos

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.